top of page

Solar Energy & Nuclear Power in Space

Sylvia Rose

Solar energy and nuclear power are the two major forms of energy in space. Solar panels are familiar on satellites and spacecraft. Nuclear

energy fuels deep space missions.



image: NASA
image: NASA

Solar Energy: Power of the Sun


Solar panels installed on spacecraft capture sunlight and convert it to electrical energy. This method is most often used. On Earth, clouds and atmosphere reduce solar efficiency.


In the vacuum of space solar panels gather energy unhindered. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory uses solar to generate energy for operating complex scientific instruments and communication systems.


Solar power converts sunlight to electricity using photovoltaic (PV) cells. The principle is relatively simple. PV cells, usually made with the metalloid silicon, absorb photons from sunlight to convert them into electrical current.



solar powered CubeSats - European Space Agency (ESA)
solar powered CubeSats - European Space Agency (ESA)

A typical solar panel can convert around 15-20% of solar energy into usable electricity, making it a reliable energy source close to the Sun. Solar power is sustainable and has low operational costs once the panels are deployed.


Solar panels can power various systems, from onboard computers to propulsion thrusters. Significant limitations arise however as a craft travels further from the Sun.




The power output of solar panels decreases significantly beyond Mars. This creates problems for missions to distant destinations like Pluto, over four billion kilometers away.


In missions to the outer solar system, solar panel size would need to be greatly increased to generate enough power, adding weight and complexity. Solar power is susceptible to disruptions.


Shadows of planets or other spacecraft can interrupt power generation, requiring implementation of battery systems for backup. Solar flares and other space weather phenomena can also damage or degrade solar panels.



NASA image
NASA image

Nuclear Power: Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs)


For missions beyond sunlight, or needing a reliable and independent power source, nuclear power is the alternative. The standard of deep space exploration is the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG).


RTGs don't rely on nuclear fission as a traditional nuclear power plant does. They use the natural decay of radioactive materials, typically Plutonium-238.


Plutonium-238 undergoes radioactive decay, releasing heat as a byproduct. This heat is then converted into electricity using thermoelectric generators (TEGs).




TEGs use the Seebeck effect, in which a temperature difference between two dissimilar conductors creates a voltage, driving an electrical current. RTGs have many advantages.


They provide a long-lasting, stable, and predictable power source, independent of sunlight or external conditions. They're ideal for missions to the darkness of space.


Some deeper space uses include the Voyager probes, the New Horizons mission to Pluto, and the Curiosity and Perseverance Rovers on Mars. They can also operate in extreme environments.



Mars Curiosity Rover (selfie)
Mars Curiosity Rover (selfie)

NASA's Voyager spacecraft have been exploring the outer solar system since the 1970s. The longevity and reliability of RTGs mean spacecraft can function for years without relying on sunlight.


RTGs also have challenges. Plutonium-238 is a rare and expensive material needing specialized production facilities. Concern rise about safety and environmental effects of launching radioactive materials into space.


The relatively low efficiency of TEGs means RTGs generate less electricity compared to comparable solar panels. However, they're essential for long-term missions. For instance, Curiosity Rover sends valuable data about Mars' environment and geology.



Mars has ice caps at both poles, together about the size of the Greenland Ice Sheet
Mars has ice caps at both poles, together about the size of the Greenland Ice Sheet

Comparison of Energy Sources


The choice of energy source influences mission design, vehicle capabilities, and length of operational time in space.


Solar Energy


Pros:


  • Abundant near the Sun: Solar energy is readily available for missions close to our star.

  • Simple technology: Solar panels are relatively easy to manufacture and deploy.

  • Low operational costs: Once deployed, solar panels have minimal maintenance needs.


Cons:


  • Ineffective at great distances from the Sun: Performance declines sharply as spacecraft move further away.

  • Performance affected by solar conditions: Solar flares and dust can affect efficiency.




Nuclear Energy


Pros:


  • Consistent power output: RTGs provide reliable energy, crucial for long-term missions.

  • Long operational life: Systems powered by nuclear energy can last for decades, providing a stable energy source.


Cons:


  • Safety concerns with radioactive materials: Handling and transporting radioactive materials require stringent safety measures.

  • Complexity of technology: The design and operation of RTGs are more complex than those of solar panels.



"It's really quite primitive ..."
"It's really quite primitive ..."

Non-Fiction Books:


Fiction Books:

READ: Lora Ley Adventures - Germanic Mythology Fiction Series

READ: Reiker For Hire - Victorian Detective Murder Mysteries









 
 

copyright Sylvia Rose 2024

bottom of page